Does The Breed Of Dog Matter In Dog Bite Injury Cases?
Many people would think that the breed of a dog involved in an attack would be important in a personal injury lawsuit, but experienced Buffalo personal injury attorneys will tell you that it is not. While some breeds of dogs – such as Pit Bulls or Doberman Pinschers – often are considered more dangerous by nature, New York State courts have determined that the breed of a dog is not evidence of a particular dog’s “vicious propensities.”
Receive Compensation for Injuries By A Dog Attack
To receive compensation for injuries caused by a dog attack, a personal injury lawyer almost always must be able to prove that the dog owner knew that specific dog had “vicious propensities” prior to an attack. In New York, the courts have ruled that the breed of the dog is not important. Instead, what is important is proof that the specific dog involved had a tendency to engage in dangerous behavior and that the owner was aware of this tendency.
As a result, personal injury lawyers are usually less concerned about the breed of dog than about uncovering evidence of the dog’s prior behavior. Evidence of vicious propensities may include prior incidents of snapping, snarling or jumping up on people. Courts may also consider whether the dog was kept as a guard dog or a pet.